Jun 062013
 

Allotment, Fomapan 100, 5x4 film

Cossington South Lakes, Fomapan 100, 5x4 filmFlooded Field, Fomapan 100, 5x4 film

Cossington South Lakes, Fomapan 100, 5x4 film

Fomapan 100 was the first film I purchased to use with the Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic. I chose it for one reason – cost – it worked out at about 50p a sheet, which was roughly half the cost of the next cheapest film I could find (which happened to be Rollei IR400).

Prior to that I’d tried using paper negatives to get a feel for using the camera (and because I’d been given a lot of old photographic paper) but the results were a little unpredictable. Some of the paper was quite old and it was difficult to find the precise ISO to base meter readings on. Photographic paper is normally around ISO 6 but it slowly loses its sensitivity to light after its expiration date, with the speed of this degradation depending on how it has been kept.

After spending some time thinking about how I was going to process sheet film I picked up a Paterson 3 reel tank along with a MOD54 insert. This method uses 1L of fluid to process up to 6 sheets at a time so it’s perhaps not the cheapest in terms of processing costs but it seemed to offer the lowest set up costs.

I didn’t find the MOD54 the easiest thing to use for a couple of reasons:-
1/ It took me some time to get used to loading the film. I practiced in daylight with some test sheets, I practiced with my eyes closed, but still when it came to doing it for real in the change bag it was a shambles. I’m a lot more comfortable loading it now but it has taken me some time to get used to it.
2/ Uneven development. I noticed something that other people had reported, denser negatives (resulting in brighter areas) around where the fins held the film in place. This was more noticeable in areas of continuous tone, like skies/snow.

The difficulty I had loading this film on to the MOD54 for developing led me to discover what is probably the biggest issue with Fomapan 100 – the emulsion does appear to be quite fragile. I had scratches on quite a few of the first sheets I used which looked like they were made by the fins of the MOD54. Additionally I spent so long loading the MOD54 that it become slightly humid inside the change bag and I had a couple of instances of sheets of film touching and patches of emulsion coming off.

Out of the first fifteen or so sheets I probably had one that I’d consider ok so I decided a different approach was in order and processed the next couple of batches by hand using dev and fix in takeaway containers inside my change bag. The bottom three of the images above were processed using this method, with Rodinal 1:40 for 7 mins 30 seconds.

By now I was starting to think that large format wasn’t worth the extra stress. I didn’t want to process sheets by hand and I needed to overcome the scratching and uneven processing issues I was having using the MOD54

I shot four more sheets and loaded them – loading four sheets (two each side) was a lot easier than loading the full quota of six. I’d run out of Rodinal by this point and only had Ilfotech HC which, according the data sheet for the film is not a recommended developer. The Massive Dev Chart had no time for the Fomanpan 100/HC combination so I used the Fomapan 100/HC-110 dilution F time which was 12 mins when rating the film @ ISO100.

Some extra research about the uneven development revealed that my agitation technique had been causing the development issues and possibly some of the scratching. There seemed to be more advice/videos available since I had purchased the MOD54, including this video showing the agitation technique recommended by the inventor. This had to be worth a go so I opted for slow inversion of the tank followed by a twist, doing this for first minute of development and then again for 10s at the start of each minute. This next batch came out absolutely fine and I was starting to think that maybe this film is alright after all. The top image above was shot @ ISO100 and developed in Ilfotech HC 1+47 for 12 minutes @ 20C.

I decided to experiment with the remaining sheets to see how well Fomaoan 100 coped with being pushed, first one, then two stops, mainly because I wanted to explore using the Graflex without a tripod. The development times for these were as follows:-

Fomapan 100 shot at EI200, 18 minutes in Ilfotech HC 1+47 @ 20C
Fomapan 100 shot at EI400, 24 minutes in Ilfotech HC 1+47 @ 20C

These times were based on these general guidelines for push processing and also this excellent resource page for Kodak HC-110 (Ok, so I know Ilfoech HC and HC-110 are different developers but they do seem to be very similar)

Both sets of tests came out really well – there was a slight increase in contrast but I couldn’t discern a great deal of difference in the grain.

Foma’s own product text states that Fomapan 100 Classic “gives good results even when over-exposed by 1 stop (asa 50/18) or under-exposed by 2 (asa 400/27), without any great impact on processing, that is without having to change the developing time or the bath temperature” but I’ve yet to test these claims.

I’ve used all 50 sheets now but I’ll be getting some more – if you’re wanting to shoot large format and trying to minimize costs, two things that don’t often go together, then I can recommend Fomapan 100. Maybe it needs treating with extra care as it lacks the some of the durability of modern emulsions but it’s more than capable of producing quality results.

Sep 102012
 

There are probably thousands of articles on developing your own black and white film at home but when I came to develop my first one I had no idea where to start, I couldn’t find any single resource that told me everything I would need and how to do it. In the end I lazily purchased a Print and Film Developing Kit and some random chemicals based on a few minutes research. My first attempt was a stress filled nightmare but only because I wasn’t prepared for how easy it actually is, and even though I’m now confident that I can get good results those early attempts are hopefully still fresh enough in my mind for me to be able to include all the important details.

What to buy…

1. A developing tank
There are many sizes of these – you want to choose one that fits what you want to do. I have a two reel tank – this comes with two adjustable reels for 35mm/120/127 and will allow me to develop 1 x 35, 2 x 35mm or 1 x 120. I bought this one – http://www.firstcall-photographic.co.uk/products/823/ap-developing-tank-universal. If you think you might one day want to develop 5×4 film you might want to consider a three tank reel as it can be used along with the MOD54 Large Format Film Processor for this purpose.

2. Measuring cylinders
In order to develop your film you are going to need to prepare 4 (or more) lots of chemicals. “Prepare” perhaps makes it sound a lot more complicated than it is – all you have to do is dilute them according to the instructions, but the levels of dilutions differ for the various types of chemicals. So before you start you’re going to need 4 liquids in containers that you can safely pour from, and these containers are all going to need to be able to hold enough liquid to cover your film. My two tank reel needs 590ml to cover 1 x 120 or 650ml for 2 x 35mm so if you go this route you need to make sure all 4 containers can hold 650ml. If you go for a bigger tank you won’t necessarily need to use more liquid as the tank spends most of its time standing the right way up with the film(s) and the liquid at the bottom.

Personally I like to mix my developer in a proper 650ml measuring cylinder that is only ever used for developer – and it has DEVELOPER written in marker on it so that I don’t use it for anything else. The other chemicals I mix in the cheapest plastic mixing jugs that I could find – they were 29p each or similar – and each of these is also labelled:- STOP, FIX, RINSE AID. In order to measure the other chemicals you are going to need at least one other container but I’d go for two – a 100ml one graduated in 5ml intervals and either a 25ml or 50ml graduated in 1ml intervals.

3. Film Clips
You could use clothes pegs or bulldog clips, but I like the proper film clips as they clamp into the film and stop it falling down whilst drying. I didn’t use them the first time and ended up with an entire roll of film on the garage floor. Twice.

4. A thermometer
Film development will generally be done between 18C and 25C so you want something that at least covers those ranges – a standard film thermometer might cover 15-50C. You also need to bear in mind that some developers come in powder form and need to be mixed at a higher temperature, such as Kodak D-76 which needs mixing at 55C, just outside the range of my thermometer. So if you decide on any powdered chemicals, check what temperature they need mixing at.

5. A stirring rod.
Essential for making sure any powder is dissolved, but not really necessary for liquids.

6. Print trays.
Print trays? It might seem ludicrous because we’re not planning on doing any printing, but who knows – maybe you’ll want to do some contact prints later – but a cheap set of 8×10 will come in handy to corral and carry around all that wet stuff like discarded jugs and cylinders.

7. Chemicals
Now this is the bit where you’ve got to do some thinking – developer choice can be influenced by the type of film you are planning to process first, or the type of film you are planning to process most frequently. I went for a packet of Kodak D-76 first of all because it was the smallest, cheapest developer on offer and I didn’t know if I’d ever develop more than one roll of film. Once I’d chosen the developer I checked the datasheet for the film (which was Ilford DELTA 3200) and checked that a development time was listed for this developer, which it was. So before you choose a developer, check the film’s datasheet, search to see how other people are developing that film, or check the Massive Dev Chart for your film and see other peoples recommendations. For simplicity lets choose a set of chemicals:-

DEVELOPER – Ilford Ilfotech DD-X
Unless you are using an exotic film you’ll be able to find instructions for processing it using DD-X – if not try another liquid developer, such as Rodinal or Ilford Ilfosol 3 (or try powder, but I think that introduces an unnecessary complication for a first attempt at developing).

STOP – Ilford Ilfostop Stop Bath
Any stop bath will do, or even water, but let’s go with a recognised brand for a first attempt – we don’t want any of our steps to fail.

FIX – Ilford Rapid Fixer
I recommended this fixer because a) it’s quick, b) it eliminates the need for a Hypo Clearing Agent, which would add another step to our process. If you decide to use another fixer (which is also referred to as Hypo) check if it needs a Hypo Clearing Agent. So many people document their processing experiences now that it shouldn’t take long to find recommendations.

RINSE AID – Fotospeed RA50 Rinse Aid
I use this – it’s cheap and helps the film dry with no drying marks or streaks.

Next we need to consider quantities to purchase – 500ml, 1L etc. Whilst you might immediately think that if we need 590ml of liquid to cover a roll of 120 film there would be no point buying 500ml of developer (well, I thought that) you’d be wrong, as all these chemicals are concentrates and need diluting (I did mention this above, but I thought you might need reminding).

Dilutions of the above chemicals are as follows (although always double check the instructions on the label before mixing):

DEVELOPER – Ilford Ilfotech DD-X – 1+4
STOP – Ilford Ilfostop Stop Bath – 1+19
FIX – Ilford Rapid Fixer- 1+4
RINSE AID – Fotospeed RA50 Rinse Aid – 1+200

Let’s round up our processing volume to 600ml to make the maths easier – this means we will need
120ml of developer + 480ml of water
30ml of stop + 570ml of water
120ml of fix + 480ml of water
3ml of rinse aid + 597ml of water

So you can already see that a 1L bottle of developer is going to allow us to develop 8 rolls of film but 1L of Ilfostop would be enough for 33 films so we’ll get away with buying a smaller bottle of Ilfostop. Maybe it’s worth just buying the smallest of everything first, but before you do, check the recommended dilutions so that you are aware how much working solution each will make. Also be aware that dilutions will be different for other chemicals/brands.

It is also possible to use chemicals at different strengths – for instance you might see recommendations for using DD-X at 1+4 (1 part DD-X, 4 parts water) or 1+9 (1 part DD-X, 9 parts water). Using a weaker solution will increase development time (and save money) but until you’re familiar with the process I’d stick to the stronger solution.

8. Storage bottles
It is possible to save your fixer and stop. It’s one more hassle on a first run but if you do buy bottles, make sure they are big enough to hold all the liquid you have prepared. Also add a funnel (or funnels) to the list.

9. Changing bag/tent/room.
You are going to need somewhere totally dark to load your film on to the spiral which then goes into the tank.
You can either do this in a cupboard, a darkroom or you can buy a changing bag or tent. I have one of these, and whilst it does look like my arms are undergoing dialysis when I’m using it, it is incredibly handy.

10. Negative storage bags
Search for “kenro negative storage”. The pro lab I use send their film out in what they call “high quality anti-static sleeves” but I find that they suck up dust – these paper ones perform better for me.

What not to buy…
1. Film squeegees – they will encourage you to touch the film. If a rinse aid is used the film will dry nice and clear – keep your hands off it :)

2. Chamois cloth.
I tried this once instead of using film squeegees. Don’t..touch..the..negatives. Rinse aid is good.

3. Film cap remover.
A bottle opener works just as well to open a 35mm film cannister.

4. Film leader retriever.
Are you kidding? Well ok, buy one if you must, but once that cannister is open it’s pretty easy to find the end of it.

5. Stop clock/watch.
There are some great free Darkroom apps now. I use Darkroom Timer on my android phone which allows me to program in the length and description for each step – it takes a great deal of panic out of the whole thing.

Aug 182011
 

Wolsey Island, Abbey Meadows, Leicester

For a long time I’ve been trying to get “the shot” of this building that will stop me wanting to come back here and try again. To be fair I have a few that I quite like but it was only when this film came back from Ilford that I realised what I’d been missing – I was concentrating on the building all the time and I hadn’t noticed the obvious – the space.

What is missing is as important as what remains – the gaps where the rest of the shoe factory once stood and the word “WOLSEY” painted on the chimney – these are details I had missed until a change of camera and lens forced a different perspective on me.

Canon EOS 5, Canon 24mm f/2.8, ILFORD SFX200, Cokin P003

Jul 042011
 

Ilford SFX200Ilford SFX200

Images: left – SFX200 film with no filter, right – SFX200 film with Cokin P003 Red filter

Not too long ago, inspired by the work of others (and in order to plot another point on the Stages Of A Photographer graph) I picked up a second-hand Canon EOS film camera. I managed to get an EOS 5 from ebay for around £25 including postage – I had been wanting to pick up an EOS 3 but £100 seemed a little too extravagant. I could also have bought something more fashionable, but as a first tentative step into the world of film it seemed a sensible choice – I can use all my lenses and it works pretty much the same as my main camera, the 5D (although there are some inconvenient differences, such as the lack of dedicated Depth of Field preview button)

I put a couple of films through it to see how I got on, and got them developed locally (and cheaply). Unfortunately the results were pretty poor – lots of scratched prints – but it also seemed that how I metered for digital wasn’t appropriate for film. There were some nice images though, so undeterred I decided to try again so I ordered 4 B&W films at random and it just so happened that one of these was a roll of Ilford SFX200.

I hadn’t really read anything about the film when buying it but whilst casually researching the films before they arrived I noticed that it had “extended red sensitivity” and “using a deep red filter skies can be rendered almost black and most green vegetation almost white”. Reading a bit more about the film I couldn’t really find out any solid facts about using it – although had I found the flickr group earlier I could probably have got my questions answered – so I decided to document my limited experimentation with it so far here.

Kit used:
Canon EOS 5
Canon 24mm f/2.8 lens
58mm filter adapter – as the lens has a 58mm filter thread
Cokin P Series Wide Angle Filter Holder (BPW400A) – I could have used the standard 3 slot one but as I was going to be using film and not digital I didn’t want to be relying on the need to crop the edges if the adapter was visible. (Because the viewfinder isn’t 100% there is always the chance that you don’t see the filter holder through the viewfinder but that it is visible in the shots)
Cokin P003 Red Filter

Notes:
I was using the square Cokin P-Series filters because I already had them. Kood also produce the filter accessories (adaptor, holder), which are generally cheaper than the Cokin ones.
A screw-in Red 29 filter will perform the same function. (A Red 25 filter may also be used but the effect will be slightly less strong)

Without filter/With filter comparison:
The images at the top of this page were shot at the same time (well, within less than a minute of each other) in identical lighting conditions – bright sunlight. Ok – the composition is slightly different, which doesn’t make it a 100% accurate comparison, but my slight change of position will have made only minimal difference to the exposure.

TTL metering was used for both images, metering set to Evaluative. The Red filter has a filter factor of 8, meaning that it absorbs 3 stops of light, so bright sunlight really is necessary for taking shots hand-held. Normally when using the red filter with digital I would shoot at ISO400 but as I was using this film for the first time I decided to use it as its rated speed. ISO400 obviously gives a bit of extra leeway with the aperture setting and I found that I was shooting at f/8 and f/5.6 at less than 1/100s here. Even though statistically 1/50s should be fine with the 24mm lens I still like to shoot a bit faster, so I was expecting a few blurred shots from the roll (but was happily surprised when they were all ok)

As you can see from the images above (left, SFX200 film with no filter – right, SFX200 film with Cokin P003 Red filter) there is a marked difference in the tones when using the red filter. It’s not quite true Infrared as a) the red filter still lets a lot of visible light through and b) the film doesn’t record far into the infrared spectrum, but it’s quite a strikingly different look and one which I far prefer to the 650nm digital conversion that I have.

For a more authentic Infrared effect you could use an IR72/R72/Cokin P007 filter – however this is a very dark filter and it’s virtually (if not) impossible to compose and focus with the filter on. For the time being I’ll be sticking with the red filter as the film camera is a relatively inexpensive thing of fun for me – I’m not quite ready to stick it on a tripod and take it seriously.

Jun 282011
 

Derelict Barn, Win Hill, Peak District

There are barns like this dotted around the landscape in the Peak District – buildings that have fallen into disrepair as they are no longer required. It’s pretty easy to chalk these things down as yet another photographic cliché and I won’t be presenting any argument to the contrary, but there were enough elements here – the mid-morning spring sun illuminating the building but leaving the foreground in darkness, the partially lit gate and the tree to the right – that made it worth a couple of shots.

Taken somewhere on the footpath from Hope to Win Hill with Dan and Al.

Feb 202011
 

Tree in Cressbrook Dale

Not many blog posts recently – not because of lack of enthusiasm but due to lack of time. Unfortunately earning money has to come before gallivanting around the countryside in all weathers (most of the time)

This shot was taken on a Sunday afternoon walk around Cressbrook Dale in early January with the talented and extremely pleasant Mr Al Brydon (http://www.albrydonphotography.co.uk/ or on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Al-Brydon-Photography/329360448276)

I’m often tempted to try and fit all the subject into a shot, but since I took a break from using the wide angle lens I’ve been concentrating more on using longer focal lengths (40-50mm) and trying to crop scenes to make the most of interesting light and detail. Here I liked the curve made by the tree and its shadow, how the winding path filled up the left of the frame and how the branches on the left of the tree extended to fill the sky.

This work is available at redbubble.

Jun 032010
 

Trebarwith Strand, Cornwall

Taken on a recent family holiday to Cornwall.

This beach was a lucky find – we were just looking for sandy bits on the map because our eldest wanted to go to another beach before we returned home. This is a great location though – it has caves, great sand and a really dramatic rock structure at the entrance to the beach featuring enough rock pools to keep the kids entertained for hours (if the tide is out).

This shot was taken from one of the caves accessible at low tide on the south side of the beach.

Purchase print at RedBubble

Dec 162009
 

Wet Withens, Eyam Moor

We spent ages trudging through the heather on Eyam Moor trying to find this stone circle, in the end we found it by accident just after we’d given up. The sun, which had popped out from behind the clouds a few times during the afternoon, made a brief appearance to light up the heather.

I should perhaps have taken some shots of the stones, but I got distracted by the light on this piece of grass.

Purchase print at RedBubble | imagekind

Oct 202009
 

Tree Tunnel, Watermead Park, Leicestershire

This shot is was taken one lunch time in Autumn. I’d gone out a few days earlier in search of rich autumnal colours but I didn’t really see anything that I liked. When I found this scene I was intrigued by the light more than the colours and knew it could look really striking in black and white.

Unfortunately it was windy and the end result had some movement in, so I made a note to come back again when conditions were better.

This retaken effort was processed in exactly the same way as the original but fortunately none of the leaves are blurred :)

Purchase print at RedBubble

Jun 102009
 

Frosted Barbed Wire

Another old image that I was never entirely happy with. This was taken on chilly morning excursion out at Beacon Hill with Dan and was one of the few shots I got – the rest being spoilt by the lens misting up all the time.

Whilst I liked the original image at the time I thought the contrast could have been better.

For this newer version I went back to the original shots (3 exposures, each 2 stops apart) and reprocessed them in Photomatix. This resulting image was then desaturated and had contrast adjustments.

Purchase print at Photo4me

Visit http://www.hdrsoftwaretutorial.co.uk/ for tutorials and a discount code which will give you 15% off the purchase of Photomatix.